- Windows HPC hits top 10 among supercomputers
- Ruby on Rails rolls into the enterprise
- Mobile phone chargers are energy vampires
- 10 IT security companies to watch
- Researchers getting the lead out of electronics
WAN experts Steve Taylor and Jim Metzler analyze and share best practices on WAN issues from optimization to management.
In a recent newsletter, we began a discussion of the 'Green IT' movement, and, in that newsletter, we concentrated primarily on the economics. And while the discussion there concentrated on a single equipment component, there also are arguments that in some cases, having a multifunction device as opposed to multiple-point devices can significantly reduce the overall power consumption.
This is an interesting twist on the argument for multipurpose devices. For instance, we’ve often looked at the tradeoffs between having a single “best of breed” device as opposed to multiple devices in terms of overall performance, single vs. multiple points of failure, as well as a number of other areas. In this case, Cisco (at least) makes the case that using an integrated device can also result in power efficiency and therefore be “greener.”
For instance, in Cisco’s paper, “Cisco ASR 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers: Achieving Energy Efficiency through Service Integration,” (PDF) Cisco argues that integrated equipment “can be an important component in helping you achieve your overall environmental objectives. By consolidating the capabilities of multiple single-function devices and allowing you to instantly turn on new services, the Cisco ASR 1000 Series Router provides an energy-efficient and long-lasting deployment alternative. This approach offers you direct benefits, such as reduced rack space, power, and cooling requirements. In addition, it facilitates many secondary benefits, including the ability to reduce employee travel and training costs.”
This, of course, contributes to “Green IT” from a socially conscious perspective, with the major focus being to reduce the carbon footprint of the company by using more efficient equipment.
But do companies really care about their “carbon footprint”? We’d love to have your input, and next time we’ll also share the results that we heard in some recent research.
Steve Taylor is president of Distributed Networking Associates and publisher/editor-in-chief of Webtorials. Jim Metzler is vice president of Ashton, Metzler & Associates.
Partner Content
Simplify Your Branch Infrastructure
Learn how to simplify your branch infrastructure while dramatically increasing app performance with Citrix Branch Repeater.
Download the Free Info Kit
Next-Gen Load Balancing
Free Guide: "Next Gen Load Balancing: 8 Things You Need to Handle Today's Network Traffic" shows you the functionality needed in your next load balancer.
Download the Free Guide
Accelerate Your Web Apps by up to 5x
Free Guide: "The Secret to Getting Maximum Speed from your Web Applications." Learn how you can deliver Web apps up to 5x faster.
Download the Free Guide
Comments (3)
Cost/Carbon benefits of multi-point devicesBy Anonymous on October 14, 2008, 2:54 pmSteve/Jim - you raise an excellent question. What we’re hearing from our customers and partners is yes, they do care about their carbon footprint, but the bigger...
Reply | Read entire comment
Cost/Carbon benefits of multi-point devicesBy Anonymous on October 13, 2008, 6:36 pmSteve/Jim - you raise an excellent question. What we’re hearing from our customers and partners is yes, they do care about their carbon footprint, but the bigger...
Reply | Read entire comment
Green ITBy Anonymous on October 9, 2008, 10:42 pmAbsolutely, there is increasing consciousness across the spectrum of businesses about their carbon footprint. The fact that the economics are attractive makes it...
Reply | Read entire comment
View all comments